- TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME PC
- TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME LICENSE
- TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME PROFESSIONAL
- TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME DOWNLOAD
Not everyone is understanding what you're saying, as evident by the downvotes you're getting Also, take a look at the Firefox release notes for iOS – sure it's "nice" for us devs to have access to raw GitHub issue labels or whatever those are – but for non-techie users they might be interpreted as conveying a certain messaging that Firefox is not really designed for them. Upon installing the extension, you get taken to the extension's settings screen which has a design that would definitely throw off my non-techie family members. For example Firefox recently started recommending an extension called "Enhancer for YouTube" when a user visits YouTube after upgrading to some new version of Firefox. What I think damages Firefox's user-friendliness more is how easy it is to get to setting screens that look scary to the average user.
TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME DOWNLOAD
There are things like text replacement, download progress indication on file icons, and other Cocoa-esque things that don't work on Firefox, but outside a probably very small segment of users who would even notice these things, and a smaller yet segment who would actually care, Firefox feels at home enough in macOS.
TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME PROFESSIONAL
I don't have magic professional gamer golden magic eyes or anything, but it is an area of interest for me.
So I am not exactly insensitive to latency. And I'm one of those weirdos who keeps CRTs around for his old consoles because he enjoys that true zero lag experience.
TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME PC
And I recently spent a few bucks upgrading my PC gaming rig to a 120hz monitor, which makes a massive difference. The whole system's a little sluggish in those modes, and I think FF fares worse than Chrome, but I won't hold that against FF.įWIW, Safari does feel subjectively more responsive to me when it comes to scrolling and navigating. MacOS warns me, straight up, that these modes will cause performance issues for me and my modest Intel Iris graphics. One other possible sorta-exception is when I'm using a scaled resolution mode on an external 4K monitor. The only exceptions to that statement are, well, Google properties where Google has clearly invested time and money into optimizing things for FF. Truly is close to an even 50/50 split - FF is my personal browser and I use Chrome for all work-related tasks.Īnd they are subjectively indistinguishable in terms of performance. I use my Mac (2015 MBP) 10+ hours a day, evenly split between FF and Chrome. I believe you, but I'm always so confused by hearing this. It, for normal browsing it does feel slower than Crome. Headless mode without the fans turning on, which On my machine, I can’t even launch Firefox in The API that connects to Widevine was standardized in 2017 by the World Wide Web Consortium, whose members narrowly voted down a proposal to change the membership rules for the W3C to require members not to abuse the DMCA to prevent DRM from becoming a tool to undermine competition.
TWEETDECK 280 GOOGLE CHROME LICENSE
> And while you can use or adapt Chromium to your heart's content, your new browser won't work with most internet video unless you license a proprietary DRM component called Widevine from Google. To those who say just fork Chrome adfm had a good article explaining why that doesn’t work:
Of course let “power users” (who’ll turn that crap off anyways) have their switches to do so. the end goal is pretty obvious, get the majority of Chrome users to turn on ads and tie their real names to their Chrome browser. Then block Adblocking, once again with obtuse ways to disable. Google will keep locking down Chrome and using corporate talk to hand wave it away, only recourse is to leave.įirst it’s “sign in” with obtuse ways to turn it off.
0 kommentar(er)
